I want to know something about the Cavs. Does anyone keep track of their mode on
points per quarter and their average deviation from that? It seems like a fairly simple stat, but
I think it would give a lot of information about them/teams. Are the teams consistent in their
specific quarter by quarter play throughout games the most successful
teams? Is it actually the quarter
to quarter relation in scoring within a game that’s what makes a team
successful?
I want to know if we were to
consistently have great first quarters followed by a slumping second quarter
and average third and fourth quarters if we have a better chance to win than
when we have fluky out of proportion scoring quarters like during the Lakers's
game. Is mode an effective
analytic tool?
Here are the quarter by
quarter points for the Cavs’s wins:
31 19 24 20
31 26 27 24
19 21 24 28
27 29 26 31
25 14 32 29
What do the numbers say
then?
When looking at the Cav’s
wins, which is a very small sample, mode doesn’t appear to be an effective
evaluator for us. Our mode for
quarters in general is 31, which happened only three times. I’d love it if we could just always get
31 points in a quarter every game, but that is not going to happen.
31 happens to be the only number we actually repeated in a specific quarter by quarter matching in a won game too. I think this is just a result of small sample size and coincidence. However, it did happen in the first quarter. That definitely hints the Cavs need a cushion to win their games.
Since mode is so ineffective
apparently, I’ll let you know some other things I’ve noticed. We have a dip in our second quarter
points. We have only one win where
we scored more in the second then the first. Furthermore, if we win we have outscored our second quarter
3/5 times.
What’s left to say? We are inconsistent in our wins. However, 31 has to be a magic number in
some sense.. It is involved in 3/5
wins. That means something right?
I’d love the opportunity to
examine a bigger sample size. Too
bad, the Cavs fucked that up tonight.
No comments:
Post a Comment